Simply offering someone the opportunity to opt-out of receiving unsolicited emails (or indeed pre-ticking an opt-in box) is not enough to comply with the Directive, CDMS said.
They urged companies to take steps to ensure they comply "before finding themselves the subject of a highly public complaint, or a test case prosecution such as that successfully pursued by a Guernsey businessman at the end of last year."
I covered that test case in a previous post, and also some thoughts on how we as consumers could try fighting spam by suing the spammers if we get spam from companies who breach the Directive.
If you want to know more about your rights under the Directive, see the helpful info on privacy and electronic communications on the Information Commissioner's site.
As well as basic FAQs for consumers/general public and FAQs for organisations on the UK's Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations, the ICO have also issued detailed guidance for subscribers (i.e. consumers) on marketing by electronic means and guidance for companies/marketers including on security, confidentiality, traffic and location data,
itemised billing, CLI and directories.
Their regulations cover not just email but "direct marketing messages by electronic means such as by telephone, fax, email, text message and picture (including video) message and by using an automated calling system" i.e. junk texts, junk faxes and the like. They're helpful and well worth a look if you're a consumer suffering from unwanted e-spam, telemarketing or junk email, or a company trying to keep within the law.
Tags:
No comments:
Post a Comment
Comments are moderated for spam so may not appear immediately. No need to re-post.
I'm exceptionally busy at the moment so please be patient (or chase!) if I don't reply for a while. If you need help on Blogger you're much better off posting to the Blogger Help Group.
If you're not on Blogger please click "Other" & give a nickname (you can leave out Website). Or you'll just be "Dear Anon" when I reply.